Foster v. Moore-McCormack Lines Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. The jury having returned a verdict in favor of appellee, appellant contends that appellee failed to prove a prima facie case of negligence. We do not agree. There was sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that appellee fell into a recess or hole in the ship’s fire-room, a hole ordinarily covered by a grating, but which was open, having been left open by appellant, although appellant left the jury in the dark as to why.
The open hole was lighted, to be sure, at some point of time; but, in the light of the verdict, we must take it as true, because there was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Brady v. Roosevelt S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
3Cited by11 opinions
- Eastern Trading Company v. Refco, Inc., and Refco Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Zell v. American Seating Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- The S. S. SamovarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1947
- Construction, Ltd. v. Brooks-Skinner Building Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Henry v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.