Legal Opinion
In re Stevens' Estate
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 2, 1951No. 72806PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
TAMM, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court at this time as a result of the objections, of Ernest W. Stevens to the restated first arid final account of the .Executors^ Ernest: *695W. Stevens first objects to the Executors’ account because of its failure to include therein an allowance of interest at the rate of 6% on his $1,000 legacy. The Court feels that this objection is without merit in the light of all of the circumstances in the administration of this estate.
The second and third objections of Ernest W. Stevens are addressed to the Executors’ allowance of sums of $5,811.60 to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vogel v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Mayhew v. AtkinsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1950
- Nash v. OberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1894
- Reid v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of Lustgarten v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995