Gonzalez v. Google, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
The Ninth Circuit has held that the CDA "does not declare 'a general immunity from liability deriving from third-party content.' " Internet Brands , 824 F.3d at 852 (quoting Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc. , 570 F.3d 1096, 1100 (9th Cir. 2009) ). Nor was it "meant to create a lawless no-man's land on the Internet." Roommates , 521 F.3d at 1164. Rather, section 230(c)(1) only protects from liability (a) a provider of an interactive computer service (b) that the plaintiff seeks to treat as a publisher or speaker (c) of information provided by another information content provider. Barnes , 570 F.3d at…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Rothstein v. UBS AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crosby v. Twitter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Copeland v. Twitter, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018