Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Twitter, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 29, 2018No. Case No. 17-cv-05851-WHOPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JASTA's statement of purpose explains:

The purpose of this Act is to provide civil litigants with the broadest possible basis, consistent with the Constitution of the United States, to seek relief against persons, entities, and foreign countries, wherever acting and wherever they may be found, that have provided material support, directly or indirectly, to foreign organizations or persons that engage in terrorist activities against the United States.

JASTA § 2(b).

DISCUSSION

I. DIRECT LIABILITY UNDER ATA

Defendants argue that under the Ninth Circuit's Fields opinion Copeland's allegations do not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. Crosby v. Twitter, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  4. Hussein v. Dahabshiil Transfer Services Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  5. Stuart Force v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Twitter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Angel Colon v. Twitter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API