Legal Opinion
Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 5, 2006No. 04-433PublishedCited by 565 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U. S. C. §§ 1961-1968 (2000 ed. and Supp. III), prohibits certain conduct involving a “pattern of racketeering activity.” §1962 (2000 ed.). One of RICO’s enforcement mechanisms is a private right of action, available to “[a]ny person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation” of RICO’s substantive restrictions. § 1964(c).
In Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation, 503 U. S. 258, 268 (1992), this Court held that a plaintiff may sue under § 1964(c) only if the alleged RICO violation was the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ideal Steel Supply Corp. v. Joseph Anza, Vincent Anza, and National Steel Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
3Cited by565 opinions
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bizzie Walters v. Todd McMahenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
560 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.