Legal Opinion

Isaacs v. Plains Transport Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1963No. A-9386PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners recovered a trial court judgment against respondent for damages growing out of a rear-end collision. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for retrial because of the failure of the trial court to include the element of new and independent cause in its definition of proximate cause, and its failure to define new and independent cause. 361 S.W.2d 919.

We have concluded that the issue of new and independent cause was not raised by the evidence adduced on the trial. The judgment of reversal and remand cannot stand on that ground. However, it is our…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Walker v. Texas Employers' Insurance AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Condra Funeral Home v. RollinTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Fisher v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Canales v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Big MacK Trucking Company, Inc. v. DickersonTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. E. L. Cheeney Company and Edmon Lewis Fregia v. Walter L. Gates, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. DeLeon v. Louder, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1987
  5. Howard Hughes Medical Institute v. NeffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API