In re Marshall
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
1Opinion of the Court
BÜ88, Circuit -Judge.
The petitioner was convicted in the justice’s court of Marin county, Cal., of a violation of the provisions of an ordinance enacted by the board of supervisors of that county declaring in its seventh section that “every person who, in the county of Marin, shall use any kind of a repealing shotgun, or any kind of a magazine shotgun, for the purpose of killing or destroying any kind of wild duck, geese, quail, partridge, doves, or any other birds, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor”; and by its eighth'section, prescribing *324that “any person violating any provision of this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re WilshireU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1900
- Thomson v. DanaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1931
- Vanderbilt University v. CheneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. CuddihyNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1934
- State v. McCullaghSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.