Legal Opinion
Thomson v. Dana
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 31, 1931No. 9217PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are owners of a hotel on the MeKenzie river, in Oregon, and engaged in the business of renting boats with oarsmen to persons who fish in that river. Defendants are public officers of the state, charged with the duty of enforcing chapter 185 of the General Laws of Oregon for 1931 (page 295) which regulates fishing on this stream.
Plaintiffs sued to enjoin the enforcement of this act on the ground that its provisions are in conflict with tho Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, and thereupon filed a motion for temporary injunction, based upon the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- LaBauve v. Louisiana Wildlife & Fisheries CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978
- Miles v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- H. G. Maison v. Confederated Tribes Of The Umatilla Indian ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.