Legal Opinion

Cooper Ex Parte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

PetitioN of Q. B. Cooper and others for the construction of the will of AV. A. Cooper, heard by Judge W. B. Council at chambers, at Henderson, N. C., May 26, 1904. Erom a judgment construing the will, all the petitioners, excxept B. A. Cooper and wife, appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

It becomes necessary in this case to construe a clause of the will of W. A. Cooper, which is in the following words: “And I bequeath to M. W. Cooper a certain tract of land (fully described) for the use of Arch Cooper, son of W. D. Cooper, and (if) Arch Cooper ever marries and has a lawful heir they have this land.” The appellants make two contentions: First, that the rule in Shelley’s case is applicable, and that Arch Cooper took a fee-simple estate in the land, and, second, that if the words 'lawful heirs are construed to mean “children,” and the will should be made to read “to the use of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leathers v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Nichols v. . GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Dupree v. . DupreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  4. Silliman v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wool v. Fleetwood.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Williamson v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Williamson v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Daniel v. . HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Rose v. . RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API