Whitney v. Gammon
Supreme Court of Iowa
A^ggeal from Shelly District Court. — Hon. W. S. Lewis, Judge. Action at law upon -an indemnifying bond. Defendants demurred to the petition, and their demurrer was sustained. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemee, J.
I. Lacey & Wells held a judgment against Daniel Whitney. Execution issued upon this judgment, and the sheriff seized two horses thereunder, which were exempt from execution, in the hands of Whitney. Thereafter, and on the same day, D. Whitney sold the horses to the appellant, I. Whitney. To induce the sheriff to sell the horses, Lacey & Wells, with Gammon and Wheeler as sureties, executed an indemnifying bond to the sheriff, and the horses were sold on the twenty-third- day of February, 1889. The bond was executed on the ninth day of the same month. This action is upon the bond to recover the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sanxey v. Iowa City Glass Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Waterhouse v. BlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Bradley v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Ayres, Weatherwax & Reed Co. v. Dorsey Produce Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Cole v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spokane County v. PrescottWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Donnelly v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Aber v. TwichellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Murray v. ThiessenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Weir v. Hum TongMontana Supreme Court · 1935