Legal Opinion

McInnis v. Hyatt Legal Clinics

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1984No. 83-449PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants argue that an attorney cannot commit legal malpractice when he complies with the notice provision of R.C. 3105.06, which pertains to service by publication.

An attorney may not be held liable for malpractice in doing that which the law requires in obtaining service of process. However, he is liable for effecting publication of appellee’s pending divorce, which was contrary to the specific instructions of his client and the written assurance. This is especially vital where there was no further discussion with the client about the publication. As the court of appeals correctly stated,…

2Cited by49 opinions

  1. Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Baiko v. MaysOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Jones v. Hyatt Legal Services (In Re Dow)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  4. Lundeen v. GraffOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Georgeoff v. O'BrienOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API