Legal Opinion
Simmons v. Miller
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided July 7, 1997No. IP 96-1045C-T/GPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Entry Denying Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and Granting Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
TINDER, District Judge.
The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment are before the court. The court finds that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment should be DENIED and that Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment should be GRANTED.
I. Background
Plaintiff Elizabeth E. Simmons uttered a check on December 24, 1992, to Luxury Auto, Inc. (“LAI”). (Pl.’s Br. Supp. Mot. Partial Summ. J. at 5.) The $299.75 check was returned to LAI due to insufficient funds. (Id.) On February 3,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stephen P. Turner v. J.V.D.B. & Associates, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Spencer v. Hendersen-Webb, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Born v. Hosto & Buchan, PLLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Gervais v. Riddle & Associates, P.C.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- McCorriston v. L.W.T., Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.