Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hoover
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 10, 1938No. 112PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLY, District Judge.
Upon application of the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to sec. 22(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S. C.A. sec. 77v(b), for an order requiring Harper S. Hoover and others to appear, testify and produce documentary evidence before the commission in obedience to subpoenas'duces tecum heretofore issued.
Respondents Hoover and Joerns appeared before the Commission, but refused to testify; respondent Kellogg failed to appear in response to the subpoena’s mandate.
Respondents are officers of Resources Corporation International, a Delaware corporation, whose…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Northwest Bancorporation v. BensonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Veigel v. Hardstone Brick Co. of Little Falls, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
3Cited by6 opinions
- Columbia General Investment Corporation v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Binkley Mining Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Peoples Securities Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Peoples Securities Company v. Securities And Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- McDonald v. State Bar of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.