Legal Opinion

Jacobus v. Alaska

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided April 10, 2001No. A97-0272 CV (JKS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SINGLETON, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Presently before the Court are motions requesting summary judgment filed by both Defendants and Plaintiffs. See Docket No. 39 (Mot.); 40A (Opp’n/Mot.); 42 (Reply/Opp’n). Plaintiffs have requested oral argument on the motions for summary judgment. See Docket No. 43. 1

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs are lawyers who regularly contribute their services pro bono to those political parties with views and programs they endorse. In May of 1996, the Alaska Legislature enacted 48 SLA 1996 (the “Act”), which addresses election campaigns, campaign…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alaska Right to Life Committee v. Brooke Miles Andrea Jacobson Larry Wood Mark Handley John Dapcevich Sheila AllaghaerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Jacobus v. AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Jacobus v. AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Libertarian Party of Alaska, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Alaska Right to Life v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API