Libertarian Party of Alaska, Inc. v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
The Alaska Campaign Disclosure Act expressly regulates only hard money. The question presented is whether an Alaska Public Offices Commission regulation requiring the disclosure by political parties of soft money contributions and expenditures is authorized by the act. We give an affirmative answer. Soft money can be used in numerous ways to evade hard money restrictions. Requiring the disclosure of soft money contributions and expenditures implements the act by aiding in its enforcement, deterring evasions, and informing the public. We therefore affirm the superior…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- California Medical Ass'n v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alaska Fish & Wildlife Conservation Fund v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Hertz v. MacomberAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Republican Governors Association v. Alaska Public Offices Commission and Walker Mallot for AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2021