Legal Opinion

Einhorn v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2012No. 57875PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Pickering, J.:

This appeal arises out of the Nevada Foreclosure Mediation Program (FMP). When mediation did not produce a loan modification, appellant Arthur Einhorn filed a petition for judicial review in district court. The petition asked for sanctions against respondent BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (BAC), alleging that BAC *691failed to comply with the FMP’s document production and good faith requirements. See NRS 107.086(4). After briefing and argument, the district court rejected Einhorn’s petition. It found “no irregularity as to the submitted documents”; that BAC “has…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Pellegrini v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Leven v. FreyNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ogawa v. OgawaNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Edelstein v. Bank of New York MellonNevada Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Markowitz v. Saxon Special ServicingNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Pawlik v. Shyang-Fenn DengNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Eagle SPE NV I, Inc. v. Kiley Ranch CommunitiesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014
  4. IN RE: DISCIPLINE OF CHRISTOPHER R. ARABIANevada Supreme Court · 2021
  5. BMO Harris Bank v. WhittemoreNevada Supreme Court · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API