Johnson v. California Interurban Motor Transportation Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
By this action the plaintiff, as the assignee of Thelen & Marrin, a firm of attorneys at law, and of Sanborn, Roehl & Brookman, another such firm, sought to recover the sum of $9,972.75 as a balance due said firms for legal services rendered and expenses incurred by them on behalf of defendants. Judgment went in favor of plaintiff and against all the defendants for the sum prayed, interest and costs. These have appealed from the judgment.
The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law. They are long and detailed. A brief outline of the main facts of the case will assist in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Corporation of America v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Allen v. San Francisco Wholesale Dairy Produce ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Cormac v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dunne & Gaston v. KeltnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Pacific Freight Lines v. Pioneer Express Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Dewey v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
- Fredstrom v. Giroux Post, No. 11 of American LegionDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1951
- Marteney v. Elementis Chems. Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.