Legal Opinion

Cormac v. Murphy

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1922No. Civ. No. 4060PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, J., pro tem

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in an action brought to recover the sum of five hundred dollars alleged to be due plaintiffs for legal services rendered by them in connection with the settlement of the estate of the deceased son of defendant.

On September 10, 1920, plaintiffs, who are practicing attorneys at law, with offices located in San Francisco, received a letter dated August 19, 1920, from Patrick O’Leary, a solicitor residing at Bantry, county of Cork, Ireland, concerning the estate of Jeremiah J. Murphy, deceased,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rice v. CareyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Moulin v. ColumbetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Paddock v. ColbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
  4. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  5. Porter v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunne & Gaston v. KeltnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Johnson v. California Interurban Motor Transportation Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Dunne & Gaston v. KeltnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API