Hobbs v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Guión, J., 5 May, 1909, from Oitslow. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
This is a motion by tbe defendant in tbe .above-entitled cause to retax costs. Tbe clerk of tbe court, before 'whom tbe motion was made, found and stated tbe facts, from wbicb it appears tbat tbe case was tried at April Term, 1909, and tbat D. L. Hobbs and S. T. Brittan, wbo were subpoenaed as witnesses by tbe plaintiff, bad attended as sucb at a term of tbe court prior to tbe April Term, 1909, but «were not present at tbe trial term, S. T. Brittan having died since tbe last preceding term; tbat D. Y. Justice bad attended, under subpoena, as a witness for tbe plaintiff at several terms,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- A. J. Loftis v. . Nancy RaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Cureton v. . GarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Costin v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1846
- Wooley v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
- Moore v. Guano Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chadwick v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Kinston Cotton Mills v. Rocky Mount Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- United States v. HoxieDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1930
- Venable v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1814
- Costin v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1846