Legal Opinion

United States v. Hoxie

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided March 22, 1930No. 1813-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, District Judge.

This action is before the court upon appeal from costs taxed by the clerk of court against the defendant Charles Hoxie in the sum of $1,350.50. To defendant’s objections to plaintiff’s amended cost bill, plaintiff has filed a verified answer, and the facts are presented to the court by the objections, the allegations of the answer, and the court’s record. Judgment against defendant for costs was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. Hoxie v. United States, 15 F.(2d) 762.

In his brief, the United States attorney correctly states: “Costs as such were unknown at common…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kirby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  2. Simpkins v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1894
  3. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. In re Gallatin Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Pugh v. GoodOregon Supreme Court · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Humphries v. StarnsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API