Venable v. . Martin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
When it appears to the court that a party has summoned a witness, not at all material in the suit, justice requires that he should himself pay the costs so incurred, and that his adversary should not be charged with them. But the person aggrieved should make his objections as soon as he can after having made the discovery; one strong reason for which is that the judge who tried the cause is much better qualified to judge of the materiality of a witness than any succeeding judge.
Whether the witnesses in the present case were material or not, it is unnecessary, however, to inquire, because…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- A. J. Loftis v. . Nancy RaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Dem on the Demise of Johnson v. WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
- Hobbs v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hobbs v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909