Legal Opinion

Citizens for Equitable & Responsible Government v. County of Hawai'i

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2005No. 25614PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that (1) the phrase “equal resident populations” in section 3-17(f)(4) of the Charter of the County of Hawaii (the Charter) excludes nonresident college students and nonresident military personnel and their dependents from the population base for purposes of reapportioning county council districts of the County of Hawai'i, (2) a total deviation in excess of 10% in an electoral reapportionment plan presents a prima facie case of discrimination in violation of the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution, (3) a rational government policy…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Swann v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Brown v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Abate v. MundtSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Solomon v. Abercrombie.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kostick v. NagoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
  3. Kostick v. NagoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  4. Matsukawa v. State of Hawaii 2011 Reapportionment Commission.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API