Legal Opinion

Kostick v. Nago

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided July 11, 2013No. Civil No. 12-00184 MMM-JMS-LEKPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; APPENDICES “A” & “B”

2Per curiam

The Hawaii Constitution specifies the use of permanent residents as the relevant population base in apportioning state legislative seats. In a 2012 decision, the Hawaii Supreme Court laid out the appropriate method for determining permanent residents by extracting non-resident military personnel, their dependents, and nonresident students from the total population count. The Hawaii Reapportionment Commission adopted a new legislative apportionment plan to…

3Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Akina v. HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API