Kostick v. Nago
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; APPENDICES “A” & “B”
2Per curiam
The Hawaii Constitution specifies the use of permanent residents as the relevant population base in apportioning state legislative seats. In a 2012 decision, the Hawaii Supreme Court laid out the appropriate method for determining permanent residents by extracting non-resident military personnel, their dependents, and nonresident students from the total population count. The Hawaii Reapportionment Commission adopted a new legislative apportionment plan to…
3Cases cited43 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Akina v. HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2015