Legal Opinion

Kostick v. Nago

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided May 22, 2012No. Civil No. 12-00184 JMS-LEK-MMMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; APPENDIX ‘A”

The Hawaii Constitution specifies the use of permanent residents as the relevant population base in apportioning state legislative seats. In a 2012 decision, the Hawaii Supreme Court laid out the appropriate method for determining permanent residents by extracting non-resident military personnel and their dependents, and non-resident students from the base count. The Reapportionment Commission adopted a new plan to comply with that directive.

This electoral challenge asks us to consider the constitutionality of the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kostick v. NagoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API