Legal Opinion

Hoglund v. Secura Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 13, 1993No. 93-0037-FTPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.

Florence Hoglund appeals a summary judgment dismissing her complaint against American States Insurance Company for payment under its underinsured motorists (UIM) policy provisions. She contends the trial court erred by concluding that American States' policy definition of "underinsured motor vehicle" was valid and enforceable and precluded her recovery under the UIM provisions. She argues that the definition, providing coverage only if the tortfeasor's policy limits are less than Hoglund's $25,000 UIM policy limits, (1) renders coverage under the UIM provision illusory because motorists are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Kaun v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Paape v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Dowhower v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Taylor v. Greatway InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bhasker v. Kemper Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
  5. Sukala v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API