Legal Opinion

Lanoue v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 8, 1998PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James Lanoue (defendant) appeals from the judgment of a single justice of this court denying, without a hearing, his petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. This court issued an order stating that S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), was inapplicable because the defendant was not challenging an interlocutory order. Accordingly, we allowed him to proceed in the regular appellate course and we now affirm the judgment.

In 1980, the defendant was convicted by a jury of murder in the first degree by deliberate premeditation. Although we determined that no reversible error was committed at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LanoueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. LanoueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Maza v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Hicks v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. LattimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lykus v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. QuispeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Jaynes v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. RuizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  5. Devon Services, Inc. v. WellmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API