Legal Opinion

Conner v. Quality Coach, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Ap-pellee/Defendant, Quality Coach, Inc., based on the government contractor defense. For the following reasons, we affirm.

¶2 Appellant, Bruce Connor, suffered a spinal cord injury in 1968, which left him a quadriplegic; he has no use of his legs, and limited use of his arms and hands. For the last 20 years, Appellant has been driving a modified van. Prior to 1990, Appellant’s van included two hand devices, one allowing him to steer with his right hand, and the other permitting him to brake and accelerate…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Martin v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Cochran v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Conner v. Quality Coach, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Nolan v. WynderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. Barton v. City of NorwalkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Com. v. Rescigno, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Nolan v. WynderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API