Legal Opinion

Leitner v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 16, 2010No. 09-471CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

SMITH, Senior Judge.

Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint. After careful review and consideration, and for the reasons stated below, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Mark Leitner, filed a Complaint alleging several torts flowing from the acts of IRS agents and rulings of federal district courts. In his Complaint, Plaintiff seeks money damages, declaratory judgments, and injunctive relief. In response, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Marquardt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Reid v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Addington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. Faison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API