Hanner v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for rape by force.1 The jury assessed the appellant’s punishment at fifteen years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.
The appellant contends that the trial judge erred by: (1) failing to delete portions from the appellant’s written confession before it was admitted into evidence; *704(2) allowing the appellant’s amended motion for new trial to be overruled by operation of law without holding a hearing on it; (3) allowing, in four instances, the introduction of hearsay evidence; (4) overruling the appellant’s motion for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Anderson v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Darty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Honea v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ex Parte DreweryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.