Honea v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for aggravated robbery. Punishment is imprisonment for ninety-nine years.
Appellant asserts that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction because the State failed to prove the corpus delicti; there is a fatal variance between the allegations of the indictment and the proof; V.T. C.A. Penal Code, Sec. 29.03 is unconstitutional; appellant’s confession was involuntary and was improperly admitted in evidence; the trial court’s written findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the voluntariness of the confession are…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Hammett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Self v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Barton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Ex Parte EasterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.