Boughton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*620Broadfoot, J.
Mrs. Boughton will hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff. Upon this appeal she contends that the evidence, as shown by the record, amply supports the jury’s award of damages; that a full and fair trial to an impartial, fair-minded jury properly instructed was had; that the trial court failed to consider vital medical evidence and that the order for a new trial is based solely on a conflict of human judgment between the trial judge and the jury. In effect the plaintiff maintains that the court merely substituted its own judgment for that of the jury. This argument is based…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blong v. Ed. Schuster & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Hale v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Dittman v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Flatley v. American Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by9 opinions
- Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Makowski v. EhlenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Lucas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. La FernierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Neider v. SpoehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.