Legal Opinion

Vermeulen v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1988No. A037335; No. A037462PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANING, J.—These consolidated petitions for writ of mandate seek review of pretrial evidentiary rulings made in the Alameda County Complex Asbestos Litigation cases.1 The challenged evidentiary rulings consist of *1196three general orders issued pursuant to section 19 of the Standards of Judicial Administration,2 and are generally applicable to approximately 2,000 cases wherein the plaintiffs are seeking damages for personal injuries or wrongful death resulting from use of or exposure to asbestos products.

We initially denied both petitions, primarily because of the state of the record. By…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Carlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Mary Carley v. Wheeled CoachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API