Legal Opinion

State v. Black

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1935PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.

The first assignment of error is based upon rulings of the circuit court which denied motions, for directed verdicts made by the defendants at the conclusion of the presentment of the evidence. The assignment of error based upon these rulings states“There was not sufficient evidence to identify the defendants on trial as the persons who committed the alleged assault.” This contention necessitates a review of the evidence, but we shall first take note of §13-904, Oregon Code 1930, which provides: “If the indictment be for a misdemeanor, the trial may be had in the absence of the defendant, if…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Chamblee v. TarboxTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  4. State v. McClurgIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1923

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. WederskiOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State v. CarceranoOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API