Legal Opinion

Green v. Taney

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.

Three questions are presented by the record, and argued by counsel. Named in inverse order, they are: First. That the cross-complaint of Taney, who was defendant below, contained causes of action which could not be joined. Second. That two issues, one legal, and the other equitable, were submitted to the jury; and that so trying an equitable question was error. Third. That the verdict of the jury was contrary to the weight of evidence.

It is questionable if there is anything in appellant’s first objection; but we will not pass upon the subject, for the reason that she is in no position to be…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. Fillmore v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Denver Tramway Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Voyt v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Sams Automatic Car Coupler Co. v. LeagueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  5. Kinney v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API