Legal Opinion

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Brown

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1926No. 25528PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoljdein, P. J.

The appellant, a corporation of the state of Illinois, sued the appellees as guarantors upon a contract of J. M. Dyar for certain merchandise furnished to Dyar by the appellant, and for which Dyar failed to pay. The appellees, guarantors on the contract of Dyar, defended below on the ground of fraud, which question was decided by the jury in favor of the guarantors. The appeal is from this judgment.

The case is this:

J. M. Dyar contracted with the appellant Rawleigh Company to purchase certain merchandise, which Dyar then retailed to different persons in Jones county, Miss. The appellees,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. B. Colt Co. v. OdomMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Cresap v. Furst ThomasMississippi Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sager v. W .T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  2. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. HarperWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Times-Picayune Pub. Co. v. FriersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  4. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. ThoroughmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. J. R. Watkins Co. v. BeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API