Legal Opinion

Cresap v. Furst Thomas

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1925No. 25030PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, P. J.

This suit was brought by Furst & Thomas, appellees, against appellant, H. -W. Cresap, to recover on a writ- . ten guaranty signed by Cresap, with three other parties, in which Cresap guaranteed the payment of an account made by one Farris, who was an agent and salesman for the appellees, Furst & Thomas. The amount claimed as due by Cresap to appellees was one thousand five hundred forty-seven dollars and eighty-five cents, for which judgment was rendered, and from which this appeal is prosecuted.

Stated briefly, the case is this: H. M. Farris secured the agency to sell the goods of Fflrst &…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. R. Watkins Medicine Co. v. HargettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nowell v. Mayor of MonroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Sager v. W .T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  3. J. R. Watkins Co. v. PoagMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  4. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Times-Picayune Pub. Co. v. FriersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API