Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. Tyco International Ltd.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT LU-CENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANT LUCENT’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES.
ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The discovery dispute before the Court is fairly simple and straightforward. Defendant Lucent Technologies Inc. (“Lucent”) seeks the production of the settlement agreement plaintiffs and defendant Ciena entered into in this action, as well as the underlying negotiation and drafting documents (collectively “the Ciena agreement”), and plaintiffs oppose the production of the Ciena agreement.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Subpoena Issued to Commodity Futures Trading CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- JZ Buckingham Investments LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Inc. v. Saliva Diagnostic Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lofton v. Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Thermal Design, Inc. v. Guardian Building Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Automated Merchandising Systems Inc. v. Crane Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2011
- Culley v. West Bolivar Consolidated School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2022
- Evanston Insurance Company v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.