Legal Opinion

Automated Merchandising Systems Inc. v. Crane Co.

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Decided October 21, 2011No. Civil Action Nos. 3:03-cv-88, 3:08-cv-97, 3:04-cv-80, 3:04-cv-75, 3:04-cv-48Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL

JAMES E. SEIBERT, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Crane Co.’s (“Crane”) Motion to Compel Discovery from Plaintiff Automated Merchandising Systems (“AMS”) filed on September 19, 2011.1 The Court held an evidentiary hearing and argument on Defendant’s Motion on October 12, 2011. Defendant, Crane Co., appeared by John S. Torkelson, Esq., in person, Michael T. Smith, Esq., in person, and Jamil N. Alibhai, in person. Plaintiff appeared by Charles F. Printz,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  2. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  3. ResQNet. Com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Chiles Power Supply, Inc., D/B/A Heatway Systems, Robert S. JulianCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Nickson Industries, Inc. v. Rol Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Rol Manufacturing (Canada), Ltd. And the Rol Manufacturing Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API