Legal Opinion
Greenberg v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.
Findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived.
Plaintiff was injured in front of defendant’s store on March 20, 1956, at approximately 8:30 a.m. She caught her foot and slipped on a piece of ice about two inches thick, three feet wide, and alternately described as three feet and five feet long*. The ice was rough and ridged as though it had been hacked. The plaintiff claims that defendant was negligent by reason of the faulty construction of the protruding sign, which caused water to drip in the area where the accident occurred. There is no substantial evidence to sustain this theory of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullins v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Tremblay v. . Harmony MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Spicehandler v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Schwier v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Connolly v. BurschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Glick v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Schlausky v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Cartin v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- Bach v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1961
- Greenberg v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.