Legal Opinion

Gable v. Bingler

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 9, 1941No. Record No. 2363PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

This proceeding- brings before us the correctness of a judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of W. R. Bingler, plaintiff, against Florence R. Gable and Willard E. Jameson, master and servant, respectively, for $10,000. Willard E. Jameson did not apply for a writ of error and as to him the judgment is final. Mrs. Gable is the sole plaintiff in error.

Mrs. Gable was operating- an automobile service station under the style of California Oil Service in Charlottesville, Virginia. Bingler was a plumber by trade and was working- on one of the gasoline pumps in the station when he was struck…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. McGinnis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. W. S. Forbes & Co. v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  4. Barnes v. AshworthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  5. Hogg v. PlantSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  2. Atlantic Greyhound Corp. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  3. Monumental Motor Tours, Inc. v. EatonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  4. Long & Foster Real Estate, Inc. v. ClaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  5. Mobley v. PendletonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API