Legal Opinion

United States v. Bodouva

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 22, 2017No. Docket No. 16-3937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a jury trial, defendant-appellant Christine Bodouva was convicted of one count of embezzling funds from her company’s 401(k) plan in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 664. She appeals from her conviction and the $127,854.22 forfeiture order entered against her. We affirm Bodouva’s conviction in the Summary Order issued contemporaneously with this Opinion. We write here solely to address Bodouva’s challenge to the amount of her forfeiture order. Bodouva argues that the district court (Caproni, J.) erred in concluding that it had no discretion to reduce the amount of Bodouva’s forfeiture order…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BrowneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. ContorinisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. UddinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. McGintyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  3. United States v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. PercocoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Frantz SimeonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API