Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Frantz Simeon
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 9, 2026No. 2:21-cv-05266Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 21-CV-5266 (ARR) (LGD) Plaintiff, NOT FOR ELECTRONIC -against- OR PRINT PUBLICATION FRANTZ SIMEON, OPINION & ORDER Defendant. ROSS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), alleges that Defendant Frantz Simeon defrauded investors in a Ponzi-like scheme. The SEC claims that Mr. Simeon’s actions violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Section 17(a)”), 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a); Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Section…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Enron Oil Corp. v. DiakuharaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.