Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Huber v. Denger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1988No. 87-986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Appellants have maintained throughout these proceedings that the Greene County Board of County Commissioners is without authority to assess residents of the Greene County Sanitary District served by the Beavercreek plant for the cost of retiring the debt incurred in the construction of the Sugarcreek facility. This contention is without merit.

R.C. 6117.02 prescribes the methods by which county commissioners establish sewer rates. It provides in relevant part:

“The board of county commissioners shall fix reasonable rates to be charged for the use of the sewers or sewerage treatment of disposal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Airwick Industries, Inc. v. Carlstadt Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Morse v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. City of Clovis v. CrainNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Townships of Mahoning County v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Antlers Hotel, Inc. v. Town of City of NewcastleWyoming Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Green v. Sussex CountySuperior Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Cook Road Investments, L.L.C. v. Board of Cuyahoga County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Kubicki v. City of North RoyaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Stanfield v. AtticaOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API