Legal Opinion
Townships of Mahoning County v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1979No. 78-517PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The relevant sections of law involved herein are R. C. 4905.33 and 4905.35, which, in pertinent part, provide:
*43R. C. 4905.33.
“No public utility shall * * * charge, demand, collect, or receive from any person, firm, or corporation a greater or lesser compensation for any services rendered * * * than it charges, demands, collects, or receives from any other person, firm, or corporation for doing a like and contemporaneous service under substantially the same circumstances and conditions. * * *”
R. C. 4905.35.
“No public utility shall make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or' advantage…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Columbus Gas & Fuel Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by11 opinions
- AK Steel Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Allnet Communications Services, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- DiFranco v. FirstEnergy Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
- Myers v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.