Horner v. Yance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Oconto county: S. D. Hastings, Jr., Circuit Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Cassoday, O. J.
This action was commenced October 5, 1894, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the defendant having, between May 18, 1893, and November 1, 1893, ..alienated the affections of the plaintiff’s wife, Mary Anne, to whom he was married December 21, *3531873. The complaint is in the usual form. The answer -admits the marriage, but denies every other allegation of the complaint. At the close of the trial the jury returned ■ a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and assessed his damages ; at $450. From the judgment entered thereon the defendant brings this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TrefethenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Preston v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1861
- Perry v. LoyejoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Gilchrist v. BaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
- Edgell v. FrancisMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- White v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Ash v. PunierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
- Smith v. RiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.