Legal Opinion
George T. Franklin, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carl S. Anderson, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 9, 2006No. 03-3636, 03-3697Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
434 F.3d 412
George T. FRANKLIN, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
Carl S. ANDERSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
No. 03-3636.
No. 03-3697.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued: March 17, 2005.
Decided and Filed: January 9, 2006.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ARGUED: Heather L. Gosselin, Attorney General's Office of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Joseph E. Wilhelm, Public Defender's Office, Ohio Public Defender Commission, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Heather L. Gosselin, Charles L. Wille, Attorney General's Office of…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Boggs; Dissent.
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.