Legal Opinion
Guzman v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 26, 2015No. Case No. 11-cv-69-BAS(WVG)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:(1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; AND(2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [ECF Nos. 86, 78]
CYNTHIA BASHANT, District Judge.
On January 11, 2011, Plaintiff Betty Guzman commenced this class action against Defendants Bridgepoint Education, Inc. (“Bridgepoint”), Ashford University (“Ash-ford”),1 and University of the Rockies (“The Rockies”), alleging that Defendants “engaged in a pattern of improper and unlawful conduct in order to recruit students and overcharge the federal government for federal financial aid ... through the use of standardized, misleading…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bee, Denning, Inc. v. Capital Alliance GroupDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
- BLUESTAREXPO, INC. v. EnisDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
- Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Garcia v. Praxair Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- MIDKIFF v. NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.