Legal Opinion
Huffman and Wright Logging Co. v. Wade
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 25, 1991No. L87-2850; CA A61324PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Defendants appeal a judgment that awards compensatory and punitive damages to plaintiff. They assign as error 1 the trial court’s failure to grant their motions 2 regarding the punitive damages award and to sustain their objections to plaintiffs questions, evidence and arguments about the beliefs of their group. We affirm.
Plaintiff is a private logging corporation. Defendants are members of the environmental group, “Earth First!.” In July, 1987, defendants participated in a demonstration on a U.S. Forest Service logging road in the North Kalmiopsis area of the Siskiyou National Forest to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Huffman and Wright Logging Co. v. WadeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Vannatta v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Lovejoy Specialty Hospital, Inc. v. Advocates for Life, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. HibbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. PurdueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.