Louisville Soap Co. v. Taylor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky; Walter Evans, Judge. Action at law by Thomas J. Taylor and others, partners doing business under the firm name of Taylor, Uowcnstein & Co., against the Louisville Soap Company, to recover damages for a breach of contract for the purchase of rosin, in which the defendant filed a cross-petition to recover overpayments made by it. Judgment for plaintiffs and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.
Taylor, Lowenstein & Co. brought action in the District Court for the Western District of Kentucky against the Louisville Soap Company to recover damages for breach of contract of sale by plaintiff to defendant of a quantity of standard quality grades G, H, and I rosin. The defendant’s cross-petition is based, upon its construction of this contract in reference to price, and seeks to recover payments in excess of the contract price.
*472The record presents but two questions: First. As to the quantity of rosin covered by the contract. Second. The price to be paid therefor.
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Whitebreast Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
- National Furnace Co. v. Keystone Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Marx v. American Malting Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Smoot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shader Contractors, Inc. And Citizens National Bank of Orlando, Assignee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Canadian Nat. Ry. Co. v. George M. Jones Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- United Carbon Co. v. Interstate Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- In Re United Cigar Stores Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
- Aitchison Et Ux. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.