Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 3, 1975No. Nos. 1249 and 1250, CA 4006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Defendant was charged with the crime of forgery in the first degree in two separate indictments. The cases were consolidated for trial, and the jury returned verdicts of guilty under both indictments. .The court entered judgment orders on both and imposed consecutive sentences. Defendant appeals, contending that there was only one crime and that therefore only one judgment of conviction should have been entered and only one sentence should have been imposed. We agree.

The two forged warranty deeds which were the basis for this prosecution were received simultaneously by the deputy county clerk…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. GratzOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. State v. MozoroskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API